The Supreme Court has shown sharp disapproval of the unprecedented moves of Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi, who withheld assent for eight important Bills cleared by the State Legislature. In a fiery court hearing, the Bench, consisting of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and MM Sundresh, asked questions about the delay in granting assent or returning the Bills, terming the Governor's move as a "serious issue" that could possibly jeopardize the constitutional machinery.
The court observed that the Governor had left the Bills pending for a considerable length of time, raising questions regarding the possible impact on the state's governance. The judges underlined the fact that the Governor has not only ceremonial but also certain constitutional obligations that need to be fulfilled within a reasonable period.
The development gains relevance as it points to the perpetual struggle between Tamil Nadu government and Governor RN Ravi. The state government had gone to the Supreme Court against relief for the Governor's decision to withhold assent for the Bills, passed by the legislature with a view to meeting a number of key issues.
The Supreme Court's observations have put in limelight the fine balance of power among the constitutional functionaries. The Governor's action of keeping the Bills pending for so long has raised issues regarding the possible abuse of powers and its effect on governance.
The court will likely continue hearing the case, and its ultimate decision could have significant implications for the legislative process of the state and the position of the Governor in Tamil Nadu.